Ryan Zamboni
Blog 3
1. Washington
Post.
The way I personally see the conclusion, as
Desson Howe argued that the film “keeps things open to wide interpretation” is
that Sal was in the right. I feel that because it was his shop he had the right
to post what he wanted on his wall of fame despite the neighborhood, the right
to ask that the music be turned down, as well as the right to defend his shop
in breaking the boom box.
Emerson
Emerson argued that in Lees film there were
“no uncompromised heros.” To this I must disagree and state that Sonny the
grocer had moved his family into a rough neighborhood where he was seemingly not
very well accepted. When the neighborhood turned on him he defended his store
with negotiation instead of violence, and stated basically that they were all
going through the same struggle.
Dr. Permenter
I agree that the colors used often in the
film (as well as the harsh lighting in outdoor scenes) really drove home the
point that not only was the physical heat oppressive, but symbolically, the “heat”
resulting from racial tensions was wearing the characters down. The reds and
oranges along with the harsh lighting, added a definite visible sense of stress
and discomfort for all the characters.
2.
One
example of how the framing, camera techniques, and shot distance/composition
really added a feeling of distance between the various races were the shots
with the racist rants. The same basic technique, with a quick zoom using a
telephoto lens to a medium shot of the speaking character with still framing
made the characters come across as being truly frank in their feelings toward
the other races. The fact that all the characters went on rants about a
specific race made the separation seem even further because it was not like
they hated all the races, they were saying what they thought about one specific
group of people.
3.
In this clip, the shot at 2:06 implements
many of the techniques that we have discussed in class. The Mise en Scene places the white character
mostly centered, drawing all of the attention to him and his actions. Below him
are is a small mob that seems to be looking for a fight, but they seem
unimportant as compared to the central character. At the same time, we notice
that the intensity of the scene diminishes as he turns his back and walks away.
Also notable is his placement above the angry mob, making him seem more
powerful even with his back turned, symbolically I interpreted this as his
rising above the confrontation itself and for that reason he seems like a more
likable and respectable character, at least to me.
No comments:
Post a Comment