![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi4sArx1wJCvgDIyq9pgqEOZrLnIVEi9F97BoNogdKCwbwQO96eut1YCzvt9JG7_Pv7zWE0txGvF-ZRlebMJn2M2WRyx78TI3rIBd2cab4ok6imhJhk98y92IgADqkzGEncjJsGgriWzwE/s1600/images.jpg)
This
film also made extensive use of relatively chronological flashbacks from the
different viewpoints of many characters that had played crucial parts in the
life of the revered Charles Foster Kane. This technique allowed for the
description of the life of a powerful man in a new and original way that
captivated audiences then, and I can say from personal experience continues to
do so.
The
final scene I felt to be very powerful as well, though almost annoyingly
unrevealing. Some sort of crane was used to scan over the vast collection of
Kanes possessions, slowing and then approaching the sled of Charles’ youth in a
sort of tracking shot but with the use of the crane. It is revealed that the
sled was to be collected and discarded, and as it is thrown into the furnace a
tracking shot from the ground approaches the burning sled and reveals the
origin of Charles Kanes dying word “Rosebud” in a very dramatic fashion. I also
found it interesting, and this may be reaching for an explanation or giving
meaning to something that isn’t really there, that the final shot is of the “No
Trespassing” sign featured at the very beginning of the movie. I feel (and this
is just me) that this might be some sort of symbolism that there was to be “no
trespassing” in the personal life of Kane, and the importance of Rosebud and
there won’t be, as the only link to its meaning was destroyed.
No comments:
Post a Comment